Forex · Head-to-head
Blue Guardian vs FundingPips side-by-side comparison
A head-to-head look at Blue Guardian and FundingPips — both Forex prop firms. Ratings are aggregated from public trader review scores; the stronger value in each row is highlighted.
Key differences
- A $100K evaluation costs $422 at FundingPips versus $463 at Blue Guardian.
- FundingPips offers up to a 95% profit split, ahead of Blue Guardian's 85%.
- Blue Guardian funds accounts up to $400K, versus $200K at FundingPips.
- Platform lineups differ: only Blue Guardian offers TradeLocker, while cTrader is exclusive to FundingPips.
Which fits comes down to priorities: larger funded accounts favors Blue Guardian, while a cheaper $100K evaluation points to FundingPips.
Ratings & reputation
Pricing & accounts
Rules & targets
Payouts & costs
Platforms & markets
Company
Compare their exact account models
Blue Guardian and FundingPips each sell several account models, and price, drawdown, consistency rules and payouts differ between them. These line up the products themselves rather than the companies.
Blue Guardian vs FundingPips: common questions
Answered from the comparison data on this page.
FundingPips. A $100K account costs $422 there, against $463 at Blue Guardian — $41 apart before any discount code.
FundingPips, at up to 95% against 85% at Blue Guardian. Both are the ceiling across each firm's programs — the split on a specific plan can be lower, and the table above shows the plan each figure comes from.
Blue Guardian funds up to $400K on one account, against $200K at FundingPips.
Overall drawdown is capped at 6% at both. The daily loss limit is 3% at both.
They score about the same — 4.2/5 for Blue Guardian and 4.3/5 for FundingPips. Scores are aggregated from public trader reviews, not from us.
Yes, on Match Trader and MT5, which both support. TradeLocker is only at Blue Guardian; cTrader is only at FundingPips.
Related comparisons
See how each firm stacks up against the rest of the field.
