Forex · Head-to-head
Blue Guardian vs FundedNext side-by-side comparison
A head-to-head look at Blue Guardian and FundedNext — both Forex prop firms. Ratings are aggregated from public trader review scores; the stronger value in each row is highlighted.
Key differences
- A $100K evaluation costs $463 at Blue Guardian versus $549.99 at FundedNext.
- Blue Guardian offers up to a 85% profit split, ahead of FundedNext's 80%.
- Blue Guardian funds accounts up to $400K, versus $200K at FundedNext.
- Platform lineups differ: only Blue Guardian offers TradeLocker, while MT4 is exclusive to FundedNext.
Ratings & reputation
Pricing & accounts
Rules & targets
Payouts & costs
Platforms & markets
Company
Compare their exact account models
Blue Guardian and FundedNext each sell several account models, and price, drawdown, consistency rules and payouts differ between them. These line up the products themselves rather than the companies.
Blue Guardian vs FundedNext: common questions
Answered from the comparison data on this page.
Blue Guardian. A $100K account costs $463 there, against $549.99 at FundedNext — $86.99 apart before any discount code.
Blue Guardian, at up to 85% against 80% at FundedNext. Both are the ceiling across each firm's programs — the split on a specific plan can be lower, and the table above shows the plan each figure comes from.
Blue Guardian funds up to $400K on one account, against $200K at FundedNext.
Overall drawdown is capped at 6% at both. The daily loss limit is 3% at both.
FundedNext, at 4.4/5 against 4.2/5 for Blue Guardian. Scores are aggregated from public trader reviews, not from us.
Yes, on Match Trader and MT5, which both support. TradeLocker is only at Blue Guardian; MT4 is only at FundedNext.
Related comparisons
See how each firm stacks up against the rest of the field.
