Forex · Head-to-head
FundedNext vs FundingPips side-by-side comparison
A head-to-head look at FundedNext and FundingPips — both Forex prop firms. Ratings are aggregated from public trader review scores; the stronger value in each row is highlighted.
Key differences
- A $100K evaluation costs $422 at FundingPips versus $549.99 at FundedNext.
- FundingPips offers up to a 95% profit split, ahead of FundedNext's 80%.
- Payouts run every 7 days (Stellar 1-Step) at FundedNext and bi-weekly at FundingPips.
- Platform lineups differ: only FundedNext offers MT4, while cTrader is exclusive to FundingPips.
Ratings & reputation
Pricing & accounts
Rules & targets
Payouts & costs
Platforms & markets
Company
Compare their exact account models
FundedNext and FundingPips each sell several account models, and price, drawdown, consistency rules and payouts differ between them. These line up the products themselves rather than the companies.
FundedNext vs FundingPips: common questions
Answered from the comparison data on this page.
FundingPips. A $100K account costs $422 there, against $549.99 at FundedNext — $127.99 apart before any discount code.
FundingPips, at up to 95% against 80% at FundedNext. Both are the ceiling across each firm's programs — the split on a specific plan can be lower, and the table above shows the plan each figure comes from.
Both fund up to $200K on a single account. Scaling plans and the number of accounts you can run at once are the real difference at that ceiling.
Payout cycle: Every 7 days (Stellar 1-Step) at FundedNext, Bi-weekly at FundingPips. Those are the firms' own published terms — our payout tracker records what each has actually paid on-chain.
Overall drawdown is capped at 6% at both. The daily loss limit is 3% at both.
They score about the same — 4.4/5 for FundedNext and 4.3/5 for FundingPips. Scores are aggregated from public trader reviews, not from us.
Related comparisons
See how each firm stacks up against the rest of the field.
