Forex · Head-to-head
For Traders vs FundingPips side-by-side comparison
A head-to-head look at For Traders and FundingPips — both Forex prop firms. Ratings are aggregated from public trader review scores; the stronger value in each row is highlighted.
Key differences
- A $100K evaluation costs $9 at For Traders versus $422 at FundingPips.
- FundingPips offers up to a 95% profit split, ahead of For Traders's 80%.
- Payouts run every 14 days at For Traders and bi-weekly at FundingPips.
- FundingPips funds accounts up to $200K, versus $100K at For Traders.
- Platform lineups differ: only For Traders offers TradeLocker, while Match Trader is exclusive to FundingPips.
Which fits comes down to priorities: a cheaper $100K evaluation favors For Traders, while a higher profit split points to FundingPips.
Ratings & reputation
Pricing & accounts
Rules & targets
Payouts & costs
Platforms & markets
Company
Check this firm’s payout stats, verified on-chain:
FundingPips payoutsCompare their exact account models
For Traders and FundingPips each sell several account models, and price, drawdown, consistency rules and payouts differ between them. These line up the products themselves rather than the companies.
For Traders vs FundingPips: common questions
Answered from the comparison data on this page.
For Traders. A $100K account costs $9 there, against $422 at FundingPips — $413 apart before any discount code.
FundingPips, at up to 95% against 80% at For Traders. Both are the ceiling across each firm's programs — the split on a specific plan can be lower, and the table above shows the plan each figure comes from.
FundingPips funds up to $200K on one account, against $100K at For Traders.
Payout cycle: Every 14 days at For Traders, Bi-weekly at FundingPips. Those are the firms' own published terms — our payout tracker records what each has actually paid on-chain.
Overall drawdown is capped at 6% at both. The daily loss limit is 3% at both.
For Traders, at 4.5/5 against 4.3/5 for FundingPips. Scores are aggregated from public trader reviews, not from us.
Related comparisons
See how each firm stacks up against the rest of the field.
