
Forex · Head-to-head
AquaFunded vs FundingPips side-by-side comparison
A head-to-head look at AquaFunded and FundingPips — both Forex prop firms. Ratings are aggregated from public trader review scores; the stronger value in each row is highlighted.
Key differences
- A $100K evaluation costs $377 at AquaFunded versus $422 at FundingPips.
- FundingPips offers up to a 95% profit split, ahead of AquaFunded's 90%.
- Payouts run every 14 days at AquaFunded and bi-weekly at FundingPips.
- AquaFunded funds accounts up to $400K, versus $200K at FundingPips.
- AquaFunded supports TradeLocker, which FundingPips doesn't offer.
Which fits comes down to priorities: a cheaper $100K evaluation favors AquaFunded, while a higher profit split points to FundingPips.
Ratings & reputation
Pricing & accounts
Rules & targets
Payouts & costs
Platforms & markets
Company
Compare their exact account models
AquaFunded and FundingPips each sell several account models, and price, drawdown, consistency rules and payouts differ between them. These line up the products themselves rather than the companies.
AquaFunded vs FundingPips: common questions
Answered from the comparison data on this page.
AquaFunded. A $100K account costs $377 there, against $422 at FundingPips — $45 apart before any discount code.
FundingPips, at up to 95% against 90% at AquaFunded. Both are the ceiling across each firm's programs — the split on a specific plan can be lower, and the table above shows the plan each figure comes from.
AquaFunded funds up to $400K on one account, against $200K at FundingPips.
Payout cycle: Every 14 days at AquaFunded, Bi-weekly at FundingPips. Those are the firms' own published terms — our payout tracker records what each has actually paid on-chain.
Overall drawdown is capped at 6% at both. The daily loss limit is 3% at both.
They score about the same — 4.4/5 for AquaFunded and 4.3/5 for FundingPips. Scores are aggregated from public trader reviews, not from us.
Related comparisons
See how each firm stacks up against the rest of the field.

