Futures · Head-to-head
FundedNext Futures vs Lucid Trading side-by-side comparison
A head-to-head look at FundedNext Futures and Lucid Trading — both Futures prop firms. Ratings are aggregated from public trader review scores; the stronger value in each row is highlighted.
Key differences
- A $100K evaluation costs $239.99 at FundedNext Futures versus $264 at Lucid Trading.
- Payouts run after 3-5 benchmark days at FundedNext Futures and every 3-5 days at Lucid Trading.
- Platform lineups differ: only FundedNext Futures offers TradingView and Tradovate, while ATAS Orderflow Trading, Bookmap and Jigsaw Daytradr are exclusive to Lucid Trading.
Ratings & reputation
Pricing & accounts
Rules & targets
Payouts & costs
Platforms & markets
Company
Compare their exact account models
FundedNext Futures and Lucid Trading each sell several account models, and price, drawdown, consistency rules and payouts differ between them. These line up the products themselves rather than the companies.
FundedNext Futures vs Lucid Trading: common questions
Answered from the comparison data on this page.
FundedNext Futures. A $100K account costs $239.99 there, against $264 at Lucid Trading — $24.01 apart before any discount code.
Neither — both top out at a 90% profit split. Where they differ is what it takes to reach it, so compare the drawdown rules and payout terms instead.
Both fund up to $150K on a single account. Scaling plans and the number of accounts you can run at once are the real difference at that ceiling.
Payout cycle: After 3-5 benchmark days at FundedNext Futures, Every 3-5 days at Lucid Trading. First payout: After 5 benchmark days at FundedNext Futures, After meeting program profit goal at Lucid Trading. Those are the firms' own published terms — our payout tracker records what each has actually paid on-chain.
Both use EOD Trailing drawdown.
They score about the same — 4.5/5 for FundedNext Futures and 4.5/5 for Lucid Trading. Scores are aggregated from public trader reviews, not from us.
Related comparisons
See how each firm stacks up against the rest of the field.
